![]() The only other film I've seen that pulls off this kind of tribute is Richard Elfman's brilliantly quirky "Forbidden Zone" (which admittedly does it better). Likewise for Raimi, who hasn't had much other opportunity for this beyond some "Three Stooges" schtick in the "Evil Dead" series. keep returning to that time period in their movies, this is the only time they really play with the *film* style of that period - their other views on the past are filmed through a modern lens (figuratively and literally). This is fun, because while the Coen Bros. But the film's purpose is as much to pay tribute to vanished 30s and 40s movie conventions as it is to make you laugh. ![]() ![]() From this perspective, I guess the film is at best uneven. I guess one problem people might have with the film is that they're trying to watch it as a straight comedy. I wish someone would release this out-of-print film on DVD so more genre fans would have the opportunity to check it out. dialogue, Sam Raimi crazy camera moves (indeed, in this sense this film is more entertaining than his recent sedate mainstream work), and Bruce Campbell charming cheesiness. I'm surprised this film isn't more popular in the cult world. I hadn't heard anything good about this film, and its obscurity didn't lend much credence to the theory that it was any good, but it seemed impossible to me that coming from Joel & Ethan Coen, Sam Raimi, Rob Tapert, and Bruce Campbell, that it could be totally lacking in quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |